PHYSICS 1: Appendix 1: Special Relativity: The Michael Llenos Paradox. An Original Physics Paradox taken from The Holy Koran. Inspired by Albert Einstein, the Leibniz Monad Field: based on the smallest level of space-time & Brownian motion, My Theory: The Self Creating Universe, & Quantum Foam & Dark Matter & Dark Energy. Plus, a brief summary of the Unified Field Theory. The ML Paradox refutes the philosophical idea of Materialism: The idea that the Universe is composed of matter that has always existed. (See Ripple Effect Universe & Time Stasis theory at the very bottom of this webpage.)

1) Any infinite mass, time, or matter, could be divided into an infinite amount of parts. However, anything smaller or lesser than its previous counterparts could be divided into more than an infinite amount of parts. But this is impossible since an infinite amount of anything is: 'that which there can be no greater amount of that thing'. Therefore an infinite amount of mass, time, or matter cannot exist in our finite Universe.

2) The ML Paradox also refutes Giordano Bruno's theory of an infinite universe. But how? Compare two universes that supposedly have infinite space. Giordano's version has a man shooting an arrow that either goes on forever or that hits successive walls forever. His universe is filled with stars and galaxies. The other universe has nothing in it but infinite space. Only the latter universe, of course, can be infinite but not the former universe. That is because an infinite universe is that universe that has no greater amount of space. And matter both takes up and displaces space. So any universe with matter in it cannot be infinite in size. In fact, just the fact that you are reading this writing is proof enough that the universe is not infinite in size.

Putting the ML Paradox into a Physics Equation

1) I have little training in math, and I have no training in physics. I would love for an expert in physics: student, professor, or grade school instructor to put the ML Paradox into a Physics Equation. I think it would go something like this:

2) One area of the Universe composed of apples is the same as one equal area of the Universe composed of apple seeds.

3) And one area of an infinite Universe composed of apples (or apple seeds) would be equivalent to all of the other same equal areas of an infinite Universe that make up that infinite dimension.

4) Meaning, if one cubed volume of infinite space can house more apple seeds than apples, this is the same for any other volume of the same size of cubed volume of space in all of an infinite Universe.

5) [However, some may comment that previously I said that once an infinite amount of space (the same thing as an infinite Universe) has any matter inside itself it is no longer an infinite amount of space. However, for the equation's sake, we are not taking this into account.]

6) So therefore there can be more infinite number of apple seeds in an infinite space, or infinite Universe, than the same number of apples in that infinite Universe.

Note: I have also devised a way one could scientifically test the ML Paradox below.

Note: But what are the practical applications of the ML Paradox?

1) One field involves bioengineering. E.g. why the Black Seed oil health producing properties of the "nigella sativa" plant are so great, while other seeds aren't. (If the Hadith is correct?) The ML Paradox implies that all things can be divided into smaller sized lengths forever because there exists a finite measure to everything in the Universe. A plant part cannot replace an egg yolk (or an egg white) at all its lower endless lengths. That is because an egg and a plant both have different structural components that regress smaller forever; therefore, a plant can never replace an egg totally, just at higher levels. Remember, the terms infinite and forever mean two different things. Infinite means the last number that transcends finite time. And forever means an endless addition (or endless subtraction) within the boundaries of finite time.

2) Another field involves astrophysics. There is a current theory about one aspect about black holes: that most of the universal matter that passes past its event horizon gets squished into an infinitely small mass inside its singularity. However, anything infinitely small cannot add anything to it, since it cannot become even more small. And the infinite is a number, large or small, which has no greater degree of numbers. So an infinitely small amount of mass would have to shed excess mass to stay infinitely small if any mass was added to it. And if there is no easy evacuation of this mass then the black hole, like a plugged toilet, would eventually acquire so much excess mass in its singularity that it would stop functioning all together. For the jet and counter jet and Hawking Radiation of a black hole would not be able to eject enough mass out of its singularity to keep the black hole functioning normally. But all of the matter back piled inside a black hole's singularity has to go somewhere. And I believe that matter time travels to the beginning of the universe as antimatter, colliding with primordial matter, creating the Big Bang.

Note: On how the smallest particles Time Travel backwards:

People may think that although degrading smaller and smaller would be endless for us: and, that God himself, through the reduction of a chair, could also see forever in that chair: so that there exists endlessness in everything and not just in that chair. But it is my belief that this is not the case.

[It is my belief that you could only degrade, if you had the power of God, to the smallest particle ever: a finite grain of space-time, i.e. the smallest singularity, which is the smallest particle of Quantum Foam. But if you would degrade further you would degrade to a past grain of space-time; and then even further to an earlier period until you reached The Big Bang itself, since space-time is warped, but most likely not to the First Cause itself. For the object before the First Cause is God before finite time. So one would have to transcend the past, to get to the infinite; and transcend the future, to get to the infinite, to get to either the beginning or the end, in that order. For only our infinite God can see the beginning and the end; and, only he is the beginning and only he is the end. However, the grain of space-time itself is so small that one wonders how many barriers there are to get to it, and if a civilization could reach it, and how many barriers there exists for someone to enter into the past. It is my belief that a human being would have to transcend the micro-universe to get to a grain of space-time and beyond it. And that is something the present will not allow us to do. For perhaps God could see an endless subtraction of a Grain of space-time itself. But if we finite beings saw a reduction of a Grain of space-time, we would probably see either a wormhole, time-travel, or the disappearance of the Grain of space-time all at once.]

More on the ML Paradox & to Scientifically Test Dark Matter caused by the Depletion of Ether in Space

1. As the Koran says, everything is finite in the universe.

2. So the further down you go in particle-matter (or Quantum Theory about Foam) the more particles slow down, become still, inert, then finally retrograde backwards in time. If this is so, then a black hole (if you can survive its gravitational pull) can make you travel back in time.

3. So, at the Quantum Level, black holes have the most amount of the smallest particles, and stars have more than planets--and planets have more than moons.

4. Such particle behavior could explain why gravity exists on planets, stars, and throughout black holes.

5. So to physically test the ML Paradox, all one needs to do is see if smaller particles are slower than larger particles, see if even smaller particles are inert (or frozen in place), and see if the smallest particles travel back in time--to prove this last part, I guess you could check rates of vanishing particles and see if even smaller particles vanish at faster rates than larger ones. However, to test this theory one needs to go over the research of a large particle collider. Or a device that can detect the various levels of Quantum Foam.

6. Plus, to prove that the smallest particles time travel into the past, the more smaller particles disappear (after being created: like inside a large particle collider), the more there will be an increase in the gravitational field surrounding such a proximity. Perhaps, large particle collider data can prove this as a fact.

7. There exists a suction like force that is created whenever one of these smallest particles disappears and travels backwards in time (leaving a void) which causes suction in its space-time surroundings. This suction creates, along with many other similar suctions, what we know as gravity.

[Plug the bottom of your bathroom sink and fill it to the top with water. Then open the bottom plug and watch a whirlpool of water drain down. This is a better way to view how gravity works than a marble spinning around a depression experiment. If this theory is true, then Isaac Newton's idea of ether takes the place of water in the bathroom sink--since the sucking force must work on something. And since black holes may have been sucking in ether for billions of years, Dark Matter (& Dark Energy) may be vast areas of space devoid of ether or the ether wind. If this is true then ether gets sucked into the center of planets, stars, and black holes at a faster rate than the matter it carries with it. E.g. it's similar to when a person quickly yanks a table cloth off a table and some of the dishes still remain on the table.]

Note: To scientifically verify the Depletion of Ether (and it's Dark Matter leftovers), a Galaxy's black hole (or that Galaxy itself) should be older than the farthest opposite-end diameter distance of the farthest Dark Matter invisible-gravitational cloud, or invisible-gravitational (or Dark Matter Halo) area, to the nearest facing invisible-gravitational side, that is measured, towards the center direction of that said Galaxy (in particular), in light years... In layman's terms, a Galaxy should be older than the farthest reasonably distanced invisible-gravitational cloud of (surrounding) Dark Matter from that Dark Matter's opposite invisible-gravitational facing-end, towards the nearest facing-end of that Dark Matter, in measured light years. [Meaning, a particular Galaxy should always be older than the time it takes light to travel from the far side (of a Dark Matter invisible-gravitational area or Halo) to it's nearer side facing that said Galaxy.] If my theory is correct, most galaxies should be older than their neighboring invisible-gravitational Dark Matter counterparts... For if ether is like a table cloth on a table, and you pull on the closest part of that table cloth, the opposite end of that table cloth will follow along... So if you can measure the distance the table cloth traveled from it's opposite end, and you know the rate of travel of the table cloth, you can tell how long in time the table has been without it's table cloth... It's the same with ether... If Dark Matter is the sign of ether's absence in the universe, and if Galaxies are still sucking in ether at the speed of light, you can then tell how old that Dark Matter invisible-gravitational cloud is in the universe... However, not all Galaxies can be measured in the above mentioned way since some areas of invisible-gravitational Dark Matter (or even Dark Energy) are sandwiched between two or more Galaxies... This scientific proof of measurement, in light years, can only really work with lone Galaxies (and the measurements based on their Dark Matter Halos) that are very far from other Galaxies... Plus, it's very hard to do this measurement since a good 3D invisible-gravitational Halo measurement, consideration must be taken on all sides of a distanced, targeted Galaxy away from our Milky Way Galaxy... And, by the way, Dark Matter may still have gravity inside it's invisible-gravitational dark areas of space because it's innards have the remnants of black holes and left over Galaxies and partially functioning ether byproducts... So just as Galaxies cannibalize other Galaxies in the universe, groups of older Galaxies may cannibalize the ether from younger Galaxies in the universe. Ether is like a glowing table cloth in a dark room... If you quickly remove it from a table, stuff remains but such stuff is left in invisible-gravitational darkness. The table with stuff left on top and with the removed glowing table cloth is, of course, a younger Galaxy that has had it's ether taken away... For "tidal stretching" really only occurs with matter (e.g. stars, nebula gasses, planets, moons, and rocks) but not with ether itself... And since the only purpose ether has is the propagation of light, it is safe to reason that the deletion of ether by other Galaxies moves at the speed of light. For if light does not travel at the speed of light, it no longer exists. Light and the ether are forever connected.

[The glowing table cloth, or ether, is really the medium between space & matter (or the table & the stuff on the glowing table cloth) that allows light to function and to propagate throughout the universe. For what causes the light on the glowing table cloth are the objects (or stars) on the table cloth. But if you remove the medium (or glowing table cloth) from the table, then there will no longer be light in that portion of space--because the link between light (which is caused by matter) and it's ability to propagate in space is disconnected--although the space and objects and gravity still remain. And what still remains is what is called Dark Matter.]

"And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness."--Genesis 1:3-4 (KJV)

Note: When God separated the light from the darkness, darkness had nothing more to do with the light. This darkness does not absorb, emit, or reflect light. This darkness is Dark Matter. For light and the ether are forever connected. Obviously, there existed more ether and light right after the Big Bang than in our current present. For Galaxies have been sucking in ether for many billions of years

8. And where do the smallest subatomical parts go? I believe they must travel into the distant past. It is also possible that matter traveling into the past becomes anti-matter. Such a large collection of anti-matter may collide with matter at the beginning of the universe creating the Big Bang.

Note: the oscillating force of an 'atomic clock' could be affected by the many smallest particles that pass through the monad-fabric of space-time at the center of the Earth... If this is true, then atomic clocks would be more effective the farther away from a hole in the monad-fabric... Meaning, atomic clocks should be more efficient and work less radioactively the higher in elevation from sea level you are... To do this as an experiment, one should be in an underground cave at sea level in one location with an atomic clock, while another atomic clock should be inside an underground cave at a much higher level above sea level... One should compare such data concerning both difference of radiation and difference in time... Making other recordings of various underground atomic clocks should produce data showing that the various distances above sea level and the various recordings of the radiation level of such clocks are mostly relative to one another in a curved graph...

On Leibniz and the Monad Field

Think of a single Monad as one of the smallest (but not as small as a finite grain of space-time & it's like), indivisible atom (or subatomic particle) that could possibly ever exist. Because all things in the universe (according to the Koran 13:8) are finite, a universe made up of a finite amount of connecting monads, based roughly on Leibniz's infinite model of monads, or the smallest dimension (or level) of the micro-universe, and the modern idea of the fabric of space-time & Quantum Foam, are what causes all things (e.g. subatomic particles) that are larger than the spaces between each connecting monad, to not endlessly descend (or melt away) into limbo. Now this space-time monad-fabric stops larger particles (and most objects in the universe) from melting away into nothing: thereby keeping their 4th dimensional physical form. Whatever particles, no matter how large or how small, that can slip between this monad-fabric of space-time, which is comprised of very many monads (but not Leibniz's theory of an infinite number of monads) will travel backwards in time as anti-matter, to the beginning of the Big Bang, where those particles will collide with matter, helping create the Self-Creating universe. And I believe this process of backwards time travel of particles (and matter versus anti-matter) is how God (in his infinite omniscience) created the finite Self-Creating universe that we live in.

Note: Yes, electro-magnetic forces bind objects together in the physical universe--like trees and stones and ice cubes. But what stops the smallest particles from slipping outside of this 4th dimensional universe that we live in is the Monad-Field. Electro-magnetic forces keep objects from scattering apart. But the Monad-Field keeps such objects from slipping out of the 4th dimensional universe that we live in. This Monad-Field is omnipresent but not infinitely so.

Further note:

Of course, there are differences between Leibniz's description of the Monad and my own. It is safe to say that they are similar in the sense that they are not composite (or made of parts) and that they have perception. But mine are physical (his not) in the classical sense of atoms (not atoms of modern science made of a nucleus orbited by a electron etc.) and mine only have perception in the most simplest form. But like Leibniz I don't believe such Monads are a system used to prove the idea of pantheism which I strongly oppose.

Why doesn't all matter shrink and dissipate into nothingness? And what about Black Holes?

There exists a universal net of 4th dimensional space-time Quantum Foam fabric--or a monad-field. This universal net is made up and connected by a countless amount of very miniscule, connecting monads. This fabric stops matter from completely dissipating into nothingness by holding matter back and keeping it in its present state. A black hole is where this space-time fabric has been torn apart. So in a black hole, larger material, that could not have made it past the universal net (comprised of monads) outside of the black hole, is crushed and sent back to the beginning of the universe (or Big Bang) as anti-matter that will collide with the normal matter of the primordial universe in the moments before the Big Bang. [For Quantum Foam & the Monad-Field can (in average circumstances) be analogous to a Pinball Game machine for subatomic particles. Or a sink full of water that slowly drains away while maintaining a constant volume of water that's draining. But a black hole is like a flushing toilet that sends a great deal of matter into the past. Hawking Radiation can be considered the backflow spray of such a large constant flush.]

My definition of the infinite:

1. Must be the greatest amount.

2. Cannot be more than one type of thing.

3. Cannot be divisible.

4. Cannot exist in finite time. And must exist in no time.

5. Must be equally the same throughout.

6. And cannot exist along side anything else no matter how far or how near.

*This is only how a finite being can interpret the infinite, however. Like in the book Flatland, a Mr. Circle (or Mr. Square) cannot comprehend Mr. Sphere's universe but from his own inferior point of view. [This logic proves that it is impossible for a human being to totally validate the higher dimensions of Bernhard Riemann's geometry.]

How do I know all reality is not caused by my mind?

I am not all knowing, and I am not all powerful. Something created me and my surroundings. Therefore, I am not alone.

How do I know God is not nature (or the universe)?

Because I (a part of the universe, and a part of nature) am not God.

I wrote this previously in the 613 SAYINGS:

34
"How can God make imperfect things and remain perfect?" What is more perfect? An infinitely perfect God that can create imperfect things and remain infinitely perfect, or a God that makes something imperfect and is no longer perfect? Rather God is perfect and supremely perfect.

[For God is the beginnning and the end. Meaning, he is the first and the infinite. Plus, if he is all knowing (or can see the future with 100% accuracy) then that must mean he is infinite in thought. I discuss this later in this book when I talk about Carneades and his method.]

Two versions of the Self-Creating Universe can be held at the same time for Christians and Atheists

1. Christian Version: God, in the beginning, grabbed future matter to create the Big Bang. And he allowed the doors to be opened to allow future matter to flow into the past.

"So the last shall be first, and the first last..."--Matthew 20:16 (KJV)

"Is any thing too hard for the LORD?"--Genesis 18:14 (KJV)

2. Atheist Version: The universe is Self-Creating even if, according to atheists: God doesn't exist--which is something I don't believe to be true. Meaning, the flow of future matter (that turns into anti-matter) into the past is an automatic property (or innate function) of the universe. You could even say that the PAST tugs the FUTURE in it's direction thereby creating the PRESENT. This temporal tug of war in the PAST's direction is stable in the Universe, but is magnified many times in velocity throughout the tears, rips (or Wormholes) inside the 4th dimensional space-time Monad Field. These rips in space-time throughout the Universe validate the belief of a Universe based on Relativity and not Isaac Newton's Absolute space and time. This increased velocity in the Wormholes creates a suction factor found inside planets, stars, and black holes that creates gravity or the illusion of gravity.

[For just as Existentialism can be embraced by both atheists & Christians, so can the Theory of the Self Creating Universe be embraced by both groups of peoples.]

--Man has a finite and linear-time mindset. So, therefore, it is next to impossible for him to understand the infinite and cyclical-time. This is why man's understanding of the Self-Creating universe is very difficult for him to comprehend.

[The big difference between the two types of the Self Creating universe is that in the Atheistic version, the matter of the universe, before the Big Bang, came from nothing, while in the Christian version, the matter is put there by the Creator. Some may say that this Cosmological Argument of the creation of the universe is similar to the original scientific theory. However, the reason why my Cosmological Argument is different is that the original argument says there existed primordial matter and a Big Bang explosion; while my theory says there existed primordial matter (and a collision with anti-matter from the future) and then a Big Bang explosion occurred.]

--However, there exists my Third and Original version of the Self Creating universe. In it all of the matter in the beginning of the universe comes from the future. The beginning of the universe cannot take in all of the matter from the many years of the future, so there occurs a crisis point until all of the matter explodes which in turn creates the Big Bang explosion. (Of course, God could have hidden from the universe, or been invisible, when this occurred.)

3. Why is the universe Self Creating? Because it is the only logic about creationism that makes sense. Plotinus says the creation of the universe (and time)* is like a seed that stirs to life. The problem with this analogy is that every seed needs water to turn into a plant. The water I am theorizing for the Big Bang is anti-matter from the future.

*Plotinus' 3rd Ennead, 7th Tractate, and 11th Chapter.

Note on 1927 Heisenberg Theory, plus a brief summary of the Unified Field Theory, and the Monad-Fabric & Brownian motion:

The reason subatomic particles in the universe are unpredictable (but larger groups of objects, like planets and comets, in the universe are predictable), is because of the very fact that the smallest universal particles, slipping through the monad-fabric of spacetime, have a direct gravitational influence over their larger particle cousins (meaning: subatomic particles) that do not fall through the monad-fabric, by being in the same proximity of space with one another and by having some type of minuscule mass... Reflective gravity waves are also produced by the smallest particles passing through (and creating a wake through) the monad-fabric and by heading backwards in time... Just as atoms affect small particles floating in liquids, so small subatomic particles affect other subatomic particles near the monad-field... This type of Brownian motion is similar to the original Brownian motion but instead exists in a much smaller level of the micro-universe... Now the larger an object is, the more predictable it becomes: because those smallest particles, that pass through the monad-fabric, are too small to physically (or gravitationally) influence and affect larger types of material objects (like comets, or planets, etc.) throughout the universe... [Those objects are only affected by such subatomic particles en masse... So en masse the particles of Quantum Foam (& the Monad-field) create gravitational stability for larger objects (or stars, planets, moons, and comets) but not for the many times smaller objects... For because stars, planets, moons, and comets are so much larger than subatomic particles, the en masse gravitational effect (of quantum particles) is so much slower on such objects (or stars, planets, moons, and comets) because of their large size... This slowness to act on such objects allows scientists and astronomers to more easily predict their orbits, etc.] The great interaction between subatomic particles and (the smallest particles passing through the monad-fabric) ruins the predictability of subatomic particles throughout the universe... Plus, the smallest particles, passing backwards through time, cause temporal ripples in spacetime, that make their larger subatomic cousins all the more unpredictable... All of the above proves the causal connection between the gravitational force and the nuclear force...

So there are so far three types of Brownian motion. (1) Original Brownian motion that has atoms affecting particles in liquid environments. (2) A Brownian motion of Monad-field affected subatomic particles affecting other subatomic particles and atoms. And (3) A Brownian motion of Subatomic forces en masse that affect large objects in the universe like comets, moons, planets, stars, black holes, etc.

Note: The question now is what do the smaller particles travel through to get to the past once they slip past the monad-fabric of spacetime? I believe there must be conduits, like wormholes, that are used for the smallest particles to get to the primordial beginning of the universe. When such conduits get too large, they form black holes.

Further note: Based on the diagram below, the conduits, that are like wormholes, that allow matter to travel backwards in time, could just exist inside the skin of both balloons. There is no need for there to be more universe, outside both balloons, for wormholes to exist.

"But many that are first shall be last; and the last shall be first."--Matthew 19:30 (KJV)

"Do not the infidels see that the heavens and the earth were both a solid mass, and that We clave them asunder, and that by means of water We give life to everything? Will they not then believe?"--The Koran 21:30 (Rodwell: Public Domain)

Additional Note: Do not let the diagram below confuse the reader. I believe the primordial universe was composed of a type of matter holding a spherical geometrical shape. So I believe the Big Bang exploded outwards 360 degrees in a spherical direction. The diagram below shows a double right-left & left-right picture just to make the past & future easier to understand.






The End.

[Copyright Michael Llenos 2000-2022]