PHYSICS 1: Appendix 1: Special Relativity: The Michael Llenos Paradox. An Original Physics Paradox taken from The Holy Koran.
Inspired by Albert Einstein, the Leibniz Monad Field: based on the smallest level of space-time & Brownian motion, My Theory: The Self Creating Universe, & Quantum Foam
& Dark Matter & Dark Energy. Plus, a brief summary of
the Unified Field Theory. The ML Paradox refutes the philosophical idea of Materialism:
The idea that the Universe is composed of matter that has always existed. (See Ripple Effect
Universe & Time Stasis theory at the very bottom of this webpage.)
"Is the universe infinite in size? Is time, itself, infinite in length? How was the universe created?
Where does matter, that enters Black Holes, go to? Hopefully, the following paper (Appendix 1) will be able to posit some exciting new answers to some of mankind's greatest questions...."
I want to point out that in The Holy Koran 13:8 it talks about how God placed a finite amount to everything. The Koran therefore supports my two beliefs: 1) that the Universe had a beginning (since time is finite), and 2) that an infinite number of objects are impossible to exist inside of the Universe.
Meaning, there cannot be an infinite number of Universes, since Universes are objects as well.
The Michael Llenos Paradox
If you place within the Universe an infinite number of apples,
and if you took those infinite number of apples out of the Universe, and replaced them with an infinite number
of apple seeds: you could have more of an infinite number of apple seeds (added to the Universe) than an infinite number of apples since you could add more apple seeds to that left over space.
1) The reason is that "the smaller an object’s dimensions are in space, the more of that object can exist in space”
compared with any object with bigger dimensions. And since the infinite is one constant number, an infinite number of objects in our
Universe could not exist since you could always have more of a number of smaller objects.
Meaning, it is impossible for an infinite number of objects to exist in our Universe since there is always the
possibility that more amounts of increasingly smaller objects could always replace its previous larger objects.
A) Therefore, 1) there cannot be an infinite number of objects in our Universe, and
2) there cannot be an infinite number of Universes (since Universes are also classified as objects
[albeit bigger objects]). Plus, if you did this calculation with space instead of matter, an infinite amount of space
is impossible where there is matter (since an infinite amount of space must be that amount of space
with no greater amount of space; and matter takes up and displaces space); so the Universe cannot be infinite in size. So really the
only possible place for the number: "the infinite” to exist in all existence would be in God’s economy of imagination,
or in his infinite-omniscient economy of mind.
B) Therefore the Koran proves that our Universe is finite and that it was created by a First Cause: that First Cause being God the Creator.
In the Koran 13:8, the text implies that everything in our Universe is finite, and that everything in our
Universe must always be finitely measured by everyone. Now this is logically proven to be the case.
Additional Notation from Part Three of my Philosophy book:
The Michael Llenos Paradox and Time: Why does Time not have an infinite number to it? [2012-2019]
1) Because there would exist an infinite number of hours inside of infinite time--and if you divided those same hours into an infinite number of minutes--there would exist more infinite number of minutes (in infinite time) than an infinite number of hours (in infinite time).
2) However, this would be impossible if both divisions of time (meaning: hours
and minutes) existed inside of infinite time--which they would have to.
For there cannot exist both an infinite amount of time
and an infinite amount of time x60. (The infinite can only have one number to it.
Meaning, the last number.
And this last number can only exist inside
an infinite realm.)
3) Therefore, there exists only a finite amount of time in our finite Universe.
Why Albert Einstein was correct concerning the impossibility of a spacecraft reaching
The Speed of Light
1) If a spacecraft, reaching the speed of light, were to obtain an infinite mass
(which is impossible according to Albert Einstein's Theory of Relativity),
it is possible that you could divide that infinite mass into an infinite amount of solar-masses.
2) However, there could be many times more Earth-masses than
solar-masses in that same infinite amount of mass: since, an Earth-mass
is many times less (in mass) than a solar-mass, when comparing:
the mass of our Earth with the mass of our Sun. In this case, the
Michael Llenos Paradox applies as well.
3) So how could it be possible for a spacecraft to obtain an infinite mass?
For an infinite mass would be that amount of mass with no greater amount of mass.
For an infinite amount of Earth-masses would be more in number than an infinite amount of solar-masses:
such a thing being impossible in our Universal reality.
[For an infinite amount of anything can be divided
into an infinite number of things. To be divided into more than an infinite number of things is impossible.
For the number the infinite must always be static and not alterable. If it were alterable, it
would be a finite number and not an infinite one.]
4) That being said an infinite amount of mass cannot exist in our 4th dimensional Universe:
only a finite amount of mass.
Therefore, the speed of light barrier, by a spacecraft,
cannot be obtained, according to Einstein,
since an infinite amount of mass can never be obtained in our 4th dimensional Universe.
5)
By the way, I am not saying that it is impossible to achieve the speed of light.
I am, rather, saying that it is impossible to achieve the speed of light; or even to come
close to it, if one initially has positive mass.
[To achieve the speed of light in a vehicle, one's vehicle would have to be surrounded by a
bubble that creates zero or negative mass for oneself and one's vehicle in the universe.]
In Summary:
1) Any infinite mass, time, or matter, could be divided into an infinite amount of parts.
However, anything smaller or lesser than its previous counterparts could be divided into
more than an infinite amount of parts. But this is impossible since an infinite amount
of anything is: 'that which there can be no greater amount of that thing'.
Therefore an infinite amount of mass, time, or matter cannot exist in our finite Universe.
2)
The ML Paradox also refutes Giordano Bruno's theory of an infinite universe.
But how? Compare two universes that supposedly have infinite space.
Giordano's version has a man shooting an arrow that either goes on forever
or that hits successive walls forever. His universe is filled with stars
and galaxies. The other universe has nothing in it
but infinite space. Only the latter universe, of course, can be infinite but not the former universe.
That is because an infinite universe is that universe that has no greater amount of space. And matter
both takes up and displaces space. So any universe with matter in it cannot be infinite in size. In fact,
just the fact that you are reading this writing is proof enough that the universe is not infinite in size.
Putting the ML Paradox into a Physics Equation
1) I have little training in math, and I have no training in physics. I would love for an expert in physics: student, professor, or grade school instructor to
put the ML Paradox into a Physics Equation. I think it would go something like this:
2) One area of the Universe composed of apples is the same as one equal area of the Universe composed of apple seeds.
3) And one area of an infinite Universe composed of apples (or apple seeds) would be equivalent to all of the other same equal areas of an infinite Universe
that make up that infinite dimension.
4) Meaning, if one cubed volume of infinite space can house more apple seeds than apples, this is the same for any other volume of the same size
of cubed volume of space in all of an infinite Universe.
5) [However, some may comment that previously I said that once an infinite amount of space (the same thing as an infinite Universe) has any matter
inside itself it is no longer an infinite amount of space. However, for the equation's sake, we are not taking this into account.]
6) So therefore there can be more infinite number of apple seeds in an infinite space, or infinite Universe,
than the same number of apples in that infinite Universe.
Note: I have also devised a way one could scientifically test the ML Paradox below.
Note: But what are the practical applications of the ML Paradox?
1) One field involves
bioengineering. E.g. why the Black Seed oil health producing properties
of the "nigella sativa" plant are so great, while other seeds aren't. (If the Hadith is correct?)
The ML Paradox implies that all things can be divided into smaller sized
lengths forever because there exists a finite measure to everything in the Universe. A plant
part cannot replace an egg yolk (or an egg white) at all its lower endless lengths.
That is because an egg and a plant both have different structural components
that regress smaller forever; therefore,
a plant can never replace an egg totally, just at higher levels.
Remember, the terms infinite and forever mean two
different things. Infinite means the last number that transcends finite time. And forever
means an endless addition (or endless subtraction) within the boundaries of finite time.
2) Another field involves astrophysics. There is a current theory about one aspect about black holes:
that most of the universal matter that passes past its
event horizon gets squished into an infinitely small mass inside its singularity. However, anything
infinitely small cannot add anything to it, since it cannot become even more small. And the infinite is a number,
large or small, which has no greater degree of numbers. So an infinitely small amount of mass would have to shed
excess mass to stay infinitely small if any mass was added to it. And if there is no easy evacuation of this
mass then the black hole, like a plugged toilet, would eventually acquire so much excess mass in its singularity
that it would stop functioning all together. For the jet and counter jet and Hawking Radiation of a black hole
would not be able to eject enough mass out of its singularity to keep the black hole functioning normally. But
all of
the matter back piled inside a black hole's singularity has to go somewhere. And I believe that matter time travels
to the beginning of the universe as antimatter, colliding with primordial matter, creating the Big Bang.
Note: On how the smallest particles Time Travel backwards:
People may think that although degrading smaller and smaller
would be endless for us:
and, that God himself, through the reduction of a chair,
could also see forever in that chair: so that there
exists endlessness
in everything and not just in that chair. But it is my belief that this is not the case.
[It is my belief that you could only degrade, if you had the power of God, to the smallest particle ever:
a finite grain of space-time, i.e. the smallest singularity, which is the smallest particle of Quantum Foam.
But if you would degrade further you would degrade to a past grain of space-time; and then even further to
an earlier period until you reached The Big Bang itself, since space-time is warped, but most likely not to
the First Cause itself.
For the object before the First Cause is God before finite time. So one would
have to transcend the past, to get to the infinite; and transcend the future, to get to the infinite,
to get to either the beginning or the end, in that order. For only our infinite God can see the beginning and
the end; and, only he is the beginning and only he is the end.
However, the grain of space-time itself is so small that one wonders how many barriers there are to get
to it, and if a civilization could reach it, and how many barriers there exists for someone to enter into the
past. It is my belief that a human being would have to transcend the micro-universe to
get to a grain of space-time and beyond it. And that is something the present will not allow us
to do. For perhaps God could see an endless subtraction of a Grain of space-time itself.
But if we finite beings saw a reduction of a Grain of space-time, we
would probably see either a wormhole, time-travel, or the disappearance
of the Grain of space-time all at once.]
More on the ML Paradox &
to Scientifically Test Dark Matter caused by the
Depletion of Ether in Space
1. As the Koran says, everything is finite in the universe.
2. So the further down you go in particle-matter (or Quantum Theory about Foam) the more particles slow down,
become still, inert, then finally retrograde backwards in time. If this is so, then a black hole (if you can
survive its gravitational pull) can make you travel back in time.
3. So, at the Quantum Level, black holes have the most amount of the smallest particles, and stars
have more than planets--and planets have more than moons.
4. Such particle behavior could explain why gravity exists on planets, stars, and throughout black holes.
5. So to physically test the ML Paradox, all one needs to do is see if smaller particles are slower than
larger particles, see if even smaller particles are inert (or frozen in place), and see if the smallest
particles travel back in time--to prove this last part, I guess you could check rates of vanishing
particles and see if even smaller particles vanish at faster rates than larger ones. However, to test
this theory one needs to go over the research of a large particle collider. Or a device that can detect
the various levels of Quantum Foam.
6. Plus, to prove that the smallest particles time travel into the past,
the more smaller particles disappear (after being created: like inside a large particle collider),
the more there will
be an increase in the gravitational field surrounding such a proximity. Perhaps, large particle collider data
can prove this as a fact.
7. There exists a suction like force that is created whenever
one of these smallest particles disappears and travels backwards in time (leaving
a void) which causes suction in its space-time surroundings. This suction creates,
along with many other similar suctions, what we know as gravity.
[Plug the bottom of your bathroom sink
and fill it to the top with water. Then open the bottom plug and watch a whirlpool of water drain down.
This is a better way to view how gravity works than a marble spinning around a depression experiment.
If this theory is true, then Isaac Newton's idea of ether takes the place of water in the bathroom sink--since
the sucking force must work on something. And since black holes
may have been sucking in ether for billions of years,
Dark Matter (& Dark Energy) may be vast areas of space devoid of ether
or the ether wind. If this is true then ether gets
sucked into the center of planets, stars, and black holes
at a faster rate than the matter it carries with it.
E.g. it's similar to when a person quickly yanks a table
cloth off a table and some of the dishes still remain
on the table.]
Note: To scientifically verify the
Depletion of Ether (and it's Dark Matter leftovers), a Galaxy's black hole
(or that Galaxy itself)
should be older than the farthest opposite-end diameter distance of
the farthest Dark
Matter invisible-gravitational cloud, or invisible-gravitational
(or Dark Matter Halo) area, to the nearest facing invisible-gravitational side,
that is measured, towards the center direction of that said
Galaxy (in particular), in light years... In layman's terms, a Galaxy
should be older than the farthest reasonably distanced
invisible-gravitational cloud of (surrounding) Dark Matter from that
Dark Matter's opposite invisible-gravitational facing-end, towards the nearest facing-end of that Dark Matter,
in measured light years. [Meaning, a particular Galaxy should always be older than
the time it takes light to travel from the far side (of a Dark Matter invisible-gravitational area or Halo) to it's nearer
side facing that said Galaxy.] If my theory is correct,
most galaxies should be older than their neighboring invisible-gravitational Dark Matter
counterparts... For if ether is like a table cloth on a table, and you pull on the closest
part of that table cloth, the opposite end of that table cloth will follow along...
So if you can measure the distance the table cloth traveled from it's opposite end,
and you know the rate of travel of the table cloth, you can tell how long in time
the table has been without it's table cloth... It's the same with ether...
If Dark Matter is the sign of ether's absence in the universe, and if Galaxies are still
sucking in ether at the speed of light, you can then tell how old that Dark Matter invisible-gravitational cloud is
in the universe...
However, not all Galaxies can be measured in the above mentioned way since
some areas of invisible-gravitational Dark Matter (or even Dark Energy) are sandwiched
between two or more Galaxies... This scientific
proof of measurement, in light years,
can only really work with lone Galaxies
(and the measurements based on their Dark Matter Halos) that
are very far from other Galaxies...
Plus, it's very hard to do this measurement
since a good 3D invisible-gravitational Halo measurement,
consideration must be taken on all sides of
a distanced, targeted Galaxy away from our Milky Way Galaxy... And, by the way, Dark Matter may still have gravity
inside it's invisible-gravitational dark areas of space because it's innards have the
remnants of black holes and left over Galaxies and partially
functioning ether byproducts... So just as Galaxies cannibalize other
Galaxies in the universe, groups of older Galaxies may cannibalize the ether from
younger Galaxies in the universe.
Ether is like a glowing table cloth in a dark room... If you quickly remove it from
a table, stuff remains but such stuff is left in invisible-gravitational darkness. The table with stuff left on top and
with the removed glowing table cloth is, of course, a younger Galaxy
that has had it's ether taken away... For "tidal stretching" really only
occurs with matter (e.g. stars, nebula gasses, planets,
moons, and rocks) but not with ether itself...
And since the only purpose ether has is the propagation of light, it is safe to reason
that the deletion of ether by other Galaxies moves at the speed of light. For if light
does not travel at the speed of light, it no longer exists.
Light and the ether are forever connected.
[The glowing table cloth, or ether, is really the medium between space & matter (or the table & the stuff on the glowing table cloth) that allows light to function and to propagate throughout the universe.
For what causes the light on the glowing table cloth are the objects (or stars) on the table cloth.
But if you remove the medium (or glowing table cloth) from the table, then there will
no longer be light in that portion of space--because the link between light
(which is caused by matter) and it's ability to propagate in space
is disconnected--although the space and objects and gravity still remain.
And what still remains is what is called Dark Matter.]
"And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. And God saw the light,
that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness."--Genesis 1:3-4 (KJV)
Note: When God separated the light from the darkness,
darkness had nothing more to do with the light. This darkness does not
absorb, emit, or reflect light. This darkness is Dark Matter. For light and the ether are forever connected.
Obviously, there existed more ether and light right after the Big Bang than in our current present.
For Galaxies have been sucking in ether for many billions of years
8. And where do the smallest subatomical parts go? I believe they must travel into the distant past.
It is also possible that matter traveling into the past becomes anti-matter. Such a large collection
of anti-matter may collide with matter at the beginning of the universe creating the Big Bang.
Note: the oscillating force of an 'atomic clock' could be affected by the many smallest particles that pass through
the monad-fabric of space-time at the center of the Earth...
If this is true, then atomic clocks would be more
effective the farther away from a hole in the monad-fabric...
Meaning, atomic clocks should be more efficient and
work less radioactively the higher in elevation
from sea level you are... To do this as an experiment,
one should be in an underground cave at sea level
in one location with an atomic clock, while
another atomic clock should be inside an underground cave
at a much higher level above sea level... One should compare
such data concerning both difference of radiation
and difference in time... Making other recordings
of various underground atomic clocks should
produce data showing that the various distances above sea level
and the various recordings of the radiation level of such clocks are mostly relative
to one another in a curved graph...
On Leibniz and the Monad Field
Think of a single Monad as one of the smallest (but not as small as a finite grain of space-time & it's like), indivisible atom (or subatomic particle)
that could possibly ever exist.
Because all things in the universe (according to the Koran 13:8) are finite, a universe made
up of a finite amount of connecting monads, based roughly on Leibniz's infinite model of monads,
or the smallest dimension (or level) of the micro-universe, and
the modern idea of the fabric of space-time & Quantum Foam, are what causes all things (e.g. subatomic particles) that
are larger than the spaces between each connecting monad, to not endlessly descend (or melt away) into limbo.
Now this space-time monad-fabric stops larger particles (and most objects in the universe) from melting away
into nothing: thereby keeping their 4th dimensional physical form. Whatever particles, no matter how large or how small, that
can slip between this monad-fabric of space-time, which is comprised of very many monads (but not Leibniz's theory
of an infinite number of monads) will travel backwards in time as anti-matter, to the beginning of the Big Bang,
where those particles will collide with matter, helping create the Self-Creating universe. And I believe this
process of backwards time travel of particles (and matter versus anti-matter) is how God (in his infinite omniscience)
created the finite Self-Creating universe that we live in.
Note: Yes, electro-magnetic forces bind objects together in the
physical universe--like trees and stones and ice cubes. But
what stops the smallest
particles from slipping outside of this 4th dimensional
universe that we live in is the Monad-Field.
Electro-magnetic forces keep objects from scattering apart.
But the Monad-Field keeps such objects from slipping
out of the 4th dimensional universe that we live in. This Monad-Field
is omnipresent but not infinitely so.
Further note:
Of course, there are differences between Leibniz's description
of the Monad and my own. It is safe to say that they are similar
in the sense that they are not composite (or made of parts)
and that they have perception. But mine are physical (his not) in the
classical sense of atoms (not atoms of modern science made of a nucleus
orbited by a electron etc.) and mine only have perception in the
most simplest form. But like Leibniz I don't believe such
Monads are a system used to prove the idea of pantheism
which I strongly oppose.
Why doesn't all matter shrink and dissipate into nothingness? And what about Black Holes?
There exists a universal net of 4th dimensional space-time Quantum Foam fabric--or a monad-field. This universal net is made up and connected
by a countless amount of very miniscule, connecting monads. This fabric stops matter from completely dissipating into nothingness by
holding matter back and keeping it in its present state. A black hole is where this space-time fabric has been torn apart. So in a black hole, larger material,
that could not have made it past the universal net (comprised of monads) outside of the black hole, is crushed and sent back to the beginning of the universe (or Big Bang)
as anti-matter that will collide with the normal matter of the primordial universe in the moments before the Big Bang. [For
Quantum Foam & the Monad-Field can (in average circumstances) be analogous to a Pinball
Game machine for subatomic particles.
Or a sink full of water that slowly drains away while
maintaining a constant volume of water that's draining. But a black hole
is like a flushing toilet that sends a great deal of matter
into the past. Hawking Radiation
can be considered the backflow spray of
such a large constant flush.]
My definition of the infinite:
1. Must be the greatest amount.
2. Cannot be more than one type of thing.
3. Cannot be divisible.
4. Cannot exist in finite time. And must exist in no time.
5. Must be equally the same throughout.
6. And cannot exist along side anything else no matter how far or how near.
*This is only how a finite being can interpret the infinite, however. Like in the book Flatland,
a Mr. Circle (or Mr. Square) cannot comprehend Mr. Sphere's universe but from his own inferior
point of view.
[This logic proves that it is impossible
for a human being to totally validate
the higher dimensions of Bernhard Riemann's
geometry.]
How do I know all reality is not caused by my mind?
I am not all knowing, and I am not all powerful. Something created me and my surroundings. Therefore, I am not alone.
How do I know God is not nature (or the universe)?
Because I (a part of the universe, and a part of nature) am not God.
I wrote this previously in the 613 SAYINGS:
34
"How can God make imperfect things and remain perfect?"
What is more perfect? An infinitely perfect God that can create
imperfect things and remain infinitely perfect, or a God that makes something
imperfect and is no longer perfect? Rather God is perfect and supremely perfect.
[For God is the beginnning and the end. Meaning, he is the first and the infinite. Plus,
if he is all knowing (or can see the future with 100% accuracy) then that must mean he is
infinite in thought. I discuss this later in this book when I talk about Carneades and
his method.]
Two versions of the Self-Creating Universe can be held at the same time for
Christians and Atheists
1. Christian Version: God, in the beginning, grabbed future matter to create the Big Bang.
And he allowed the doors to be opened to allow future matter to flow into the past.
"So the last shall be first, and the first last..."--Matthew 20:16 (KJV)
"Is any thing too hard for the LORD?"--Genesis 18:14 (KJV)
2. Atheist Version: The universe is Self-Creating even if, according to atheists: God doesn't exist--which is something
I don't believe to be true.
Meaning, the flow of future matter
(that turns into anti-matter) into the past is an automatic property
(or innate function) of
the universe. You could even say that the PAST tugs the FUTURE in it's
direction thereby creating the PRESENT. This temporal tug of war
in the PAST's direction is stable in the Universe, but is magnified
many times in velocity throughout the tears, rips (or Wormholes) inside the 4th dimensional space-time
Monad Field. These rips in space-time throughout the Universe validate the belief
of a Universe based on Relativity and not Isaac Newton's Absolute space and time.
This increased velocity in the Wormholes creates a suction factor found inside planets, stars,
and black holes that creates gravity or the illusion of gravity.
[For just as Existentialism can be embraced by both atheists & Christians, so can
the Theory of the Self Creating Universe be embraced by both groups of peoples.]
--Man has a finite and linear-time mindset. So, therefore, it is next to impossible for him to understand the infinite and cyclical-time. This is why man's understanding of the Self-Creating universe is very difficult for him to comprehend.
[The big difference between the two types of the Self Creating universe is that in the Atheistic
version, the matter of the universe, before the Big Bang, came from nothing, while in the Christian version,
the matter is put there by the Creator. Some may say that this Cosmological Argument
of the creation of the universe is similar to the original scientific theory.
However, the reason why my Cosmological Argument is different is that the
original argument says there existed primordial matter and a Big Bang
explosion; while my theory says there existed primordial matter (and
a collision with anti-matter from the future) and then a Big Bang explosion
occurred.]
--However, there exists my Third and Original version of the Self Creating universe.
In it all of the matter in the beginning of the universe comes from the future.
The beginning of the universe cannot take in all of the matter from the many years
of the future, so there occurs a crisis point until all of the matter explodes which
in turn creates the Big Bang explosion. (Of course, God could
have hidden from the universe, or been invisible, when this occurred.)
3. Why is the universe Self Creating? Because it is the only logic about creationism that makes sense.
Plotinus says the creation of the universe (and time)* is like a seed that stirs to life. The problem
with this analogy is that every seed needs water to turn into a plant. The
water I am theorizing for the Big Bang is anti-matter from the future.
*Plotinus' 3rd Ennead, 7th Tractate, and 11th Chapter.
Note on 1927 Heisenberg Theory, plus a brief summary of the Unified Field Theory, and the Monad-Fabric
& Brownian motion:
The reason subatomic particles in the universe are unpredictable (but larger groups of objects,
like planets and comets, in the universe are predictable), is because of the very fact that the smallest
universal particles, slipping through the monad-fabric of spacetime, have a direct gravitational influence
over their larger particle cousins (meaning: subatomic particles) that do not fall through the monad-fabric,
by being in the same proximity of space with one another and by having some type of minuscule
mass... Reflective gravity
waves are also produced by the smallest particles passing through (and creating a wake through)
the monad-fabric and by heading backwards in time... Just as atoms affect small particles floating in liquids, so
small subatomic particles affect other subatomic particles near
the monad-field... This type of Brownian motion is similar to the
original Brownian motion but instead exists in a much smaller
level of the micro-universe... Now the larger an object is, the more predictable it
becomes: because those smallest particles, that pass through the monad-fabric, are too small to physically
(or gravitationally) influence and affect larger types of material objects (like comets, or planets,
etc.) throughout the universe... [Those objects are only affected by such subatomic particles en masse... So
en masse the particles of Quantum Foam (& the Monad-field) create gravitational
stability for larger objects (or stars, planets, moons, and comets) but not for the many times smaller objects...
For because stars, planets, moons, and comets are so
much larger than subatomic particles, the en masse gravitational effect (of quantum particles)
is so
much slower on such objects (or stars, planets, moons, and comets) because of their large size...
This slowness to act on such objects allows scientists
and astronomers to more easily predict their orbits, etc.] The great
interaction between subatomic particles and (the smallest
particles passing through the monad-fabric) ruins the predictability of subatomic particles throughout
the universe... Plus, the smallest particles, passing backwards through time, cause temporal ripples
in spacetime, that make their larger subatomic cousins all the more unpredictable... All of the above
proves the causal connection between the gravitational force and the nuclear force...
So there are so far three types of Brownian motion. (1) Original Brownian motion that has atoms affecting particles in liquid environments. (2) A Brownian motion of Monad-field affected subatomic particles affecting other subatomic particles and atoms. And (3) A Brownian motion of Subatomic forces en masse that affect large objects in the universe like comets, moons, planets, stars, black holes, etc.
Note: The question now is what do the smaller particles travel through to get to the past once
they slip past the monad-fabric of spacetime? I believe there must be conduits, like wormholes, that
are used for the smallest particles to get to the primordial beginning of the universe. When such conduits
get too large, they form black holes.
Further note: Based on the diagram below, the conduits, that are like wormholes, that allow matter to travel
backwards in time, could just exist inside the skin of both balloons. There is no need for there to be more
universe, outside both balloons, for wormholes to exist.
If "negative time" could be proven to show the properties of anti-time, a new revolution of Cosmological Theory could exist concerning how the Big Bang occurred. I believe it is possible for a Universe to be Self-Creating by present & future particles that travel back in time.
"But many that are first shall be last; and the last shall be first."--Matthew 19:30 (KJV)
"Do not the infidels see that the heavens and the earth were both a solid mass, and that We clave them asunder, and that by means of water We give life to everything? Will they not then believe?"--The Koran 21:30 (Rodwell: Public Domain)
Additional Note: Do not let the diagram below confuse the reader. I believe the primordial universe was
composed of a type of matter holding a spherical geometrical shape. So I believe the Big Bang exploded outwards 360 degrees
in a spherical direction. The diagram below shows a double right-left & left-right picture just to make the past & future
easier to understand.
The End.
[Copyright Michael Llenos 2000-2022]